Publications
Optional Extended Year Program Summary: 2001-2002
This report summarizes evaluation information for the AISD 2001-2002 Optional Extended Year grant program.
Optional Extended Year Program Summary 2000-2001
This report summarizes evaluation results from AISD's state-funded Optional Extended Year program activities during 2000-2001.
Optional Extended Year Program Summary Report: 2004-2005
This report summarizes evaluation information for the AISD Optional Extended Year grant program for the 2004-2005 school year.
Optional Extended Year Program Summary Report 2003-2004
This report summarizes activities in the AISD state-funded optional extended year program for the 2003-2004 school year.
Optional Extended Year Program Summary Report 2002-2003
This report summarizes evaluation results of the AISD state-funded Optional Extended Year Program for 2002-2003.
Summary of AISD's Optional Extended Year Program Activities, 2008-2009
The OEYP state-funded program provides extended learning for students who are at risk of academic failure. This report summarizes AISD's OEYP activities during 2008-2009.
A Summary of AISD's Optional Extended Year Program Activities, 2006-2007
This report summarizes AISD's state-funded Optional Extended Year Program activities for the 2006-2007 school year.
A Summary of AISD's Optional Extended Year Program Activities, 2005-2006
This report summarizes 2005-2006 school year activities and student performance outcomes for the state-funded optional extended year program.
A Summary of Austin Independant School District's Optional Extended Year Program Activities, 2007-2008
This report summarizes AISD's state-funded optional extended year program for the 2007-2008 school year.
A Summary of Austin Independent School District's Optional Extended Year Program Activities, 2008-2009
During 2008–2009, state funds supported academic intervention activities for 3,623 students struggling in reading or math at 55 AISD campuses during the regular school year and in summer school. The program also provided parental involvement activities, staff development sessions for teachers, and student performance evaluations. Almost all students served (95.5%) were promoted to the next grade level.